Killer Queen: Shekhar KapursElizabeth by Chris Evangelista

By Yasmina Tawil

image

A time of turmoil, upheaval, and bloodshed. The youngest living child of a once powerful, feared man becomes the unlikely head of the “family business.” Following betrayal, and the violent elimination of rivals, this individual obtains absolute power while losing an aspect of humanity. In simplistic terms, this is the storyline of The Godfather. But it’s also the storyline of Shekhar Kapur’s 1998 film Elizabeth. With adept staging, a captivating lead performance, and an utter disregard for the facts, Kapur’s Elizabeth took what could easily have been a dry, stuffy historical drama into gangland territory, turning the Virgin Queen into a tragically flawed character in the style of Godfather chosen son Michael Corleone.

The monarch, who ruled for 44 years and was the last of the Tudor dynasty, had been featured in several films and TV miniseries before Kapur’s 1998 drama. But you won’t find a similar history lesson in Kapur’s Elizabeth. Kapur and screenwriter Michael Hirst filter the best elements of the historical story through the lens of a Godfather-esque drama. “I had to make a choice,” Kapur explained to The Independent, “whether I wanted the details of history or the emotions and essence of history to prevail.” In the resulting film, the emotions prevail. Characters’ motives are not rooted in their historical counterparts at all, and Elizabeth condenses about 14 years of the Queen’s early reign into what feels like only a few months on the job. Yet this allows Kapur to focus on what it takes for Elizabeth to gain power, without being bogged down by historical accuracy. The conflict here is simple: in order to reign supreme, Elizabeth must learn to smite her enemies and make herself more than just a human being; she has to become an icon.

Like youngest Corleone heir Michael in Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather, Elizabeth is an outsider looking in and yet her connection to Henry VIII helps define her identity on the throne. The Catholic Church and Queen Mary (Kathy Burke) are brutally resisting the Protestants – and Elizabeth, born of King Henry VIII’s second wife, Anne Boleyn, is a Protestant. Although Henry VIII, for his part, never makes a physical appearance in Elizabeth, the corpulent king looms over Elizabeth just as Marlon Brando’s Don Vito Corleone did in The Godfather. “I am my father’s daughter,” Elizabeth intones later in the film. “I am not afraid of anything.”

image

Kapur lucked out in the casting of the then relatively unknown Cate Blanchett, who brings the perfect blend of humanity to a figure who had long been flattened into an emotionless, mythical figure of history. Blanchett starts the film as a romantic, hopeful, idealistic girl who holds fast to her principles. When she stands accused of treason and faces possible execution, her sister, Queen Mary, gives her an easy out: proclaim that if somehow crowned queen, she will retain Catholic beliefs rather than Protestant ones. The headstrong Elizabeth will not yield, declaring she’ll instead “act as [her] conscience dictates.” As Elizabeth progresses, Blanchett hardens her performance into something like all that cold white stone that surrounds the characters. She rages, she suffers, she loses any trace of mirth or innocence, while retaining her steadfast adherence to her principles. As the film draws to a violent conclusion, the almost childlike girl that she was has been replaced by a resolute, powerful woman. “I have rid England of her enemies,” she says, her voice flat and cold. “What do I do now? Am I to be made of stone? Must I be touched by nothing?” By the end of the film, she’s slathered in ghoulish white make-up, her red hair sheared from her head and replaced with a towering wig.

Elizabeth’s final, absolute control is aided in part by her advisor and hitman Sir Francis Walsingham, played devilishly by Geoffery Rush as a cool, irreligious enforce, unlike the fiercely Protestant historical figure. The film also has him murder one of Elizabeth’s rivals, Mary of Guise, the French Queen of Scots – an event that absolutely did not happen. When grilled by advisors about the murder, Elizabeth promptly replies, “I never sanctioned it!” but she shoots Walsingham a knowing look. Around every shadowy corner in the vast, stone structures that the characters drift through, there seems to be another enemy hoping for – or literally plotting – Elizabeth’s death and refusing to recognize a Protestant queen. Walsingham protects and enables her.

Another advisor proves more of an obstacle to Elizabeth’s conquests: the grandfatherly Sir William Cecil (Richard Attenborough), portrayed cinematically as old fashioned and detrimental to Elizabeth’s success. Here, he is Elizabeth’s consigliere, her version of Robert Duvall’s Tom Hagen, who was forced to step down as Michael took over the Corleone Family in The Godfather and declared Hagen not to be a “wartime consigliere.” Elizabeth employs a similar tactic, where backed into a corner and needing to become ruthless, Elizabeth forces Sir William to retire – she has no need for his kind of advice. What she needs is a sudden, violent display of her power to silence all her enemies – those men who have been plotting against her before she even took the throne, led by the Duke of Norfolk (Christopher Eccleston).

The violent crescendo to The Godfather involves the now legendary “Baptism Montage,” where director Coppola illustrates the violent demise of all the Corleones’ enemies while Michael attends a baptism, blaring organ music overlaying the entire sequence, the murders made into a religious ceremony. Kapur references this with the climax to Elizabeth, as the Queen, embattled and embittered by all the treason and betrayal, orders Walsingham to carry out a massive purging of the men against her. As Kapur cuts from one slaying to the next, an arrangement by soundtrack composer David Hirschfelder of Renaissance composer William Byrd’s haunting choral-based “Domine secundum actum meum” plays out, creating that same religious reverence in so much bloodshed.

image

Early in the film, as Elizabeth stands accused of treason, she finds kindness only in the Earl of Arundel (Edward Hardwicke), who solely seems to believe she might be innocent of conspiring to have her sister Mary killed. “I shall not forget this kindness,” Elizabeth tells him. Yet despite this kindness, Arundel is still beholden to his Catholic faith and at one point harbors a Pope-sanctioned priestly assassin, played by pre-Bond Daniel Craig. After all other enemies have been silenced, Elizabeth hints that she might show mercy, sparing Arundel’s wife. However, when Kapur’s camera pans across a field of the severed heads of Elizabeth’s enemies perched atop pikes, he ends on the head of Arundel, still executed despite his relative kindness. It’s not personal; it’s strictly monarchy.

Elizabeth so deviates from historical storytelling that it tips into fantasy – and that’s what makes the film so resonant and entertaining. Kapur successfully rejuvenates what would’ve been a standard costume drama in anyone else’s hands and baptizes it into a piece of blood-soaked, crime drama-inspired pop art the likes of which would make an appropriate double-feature with Coppola’s Godfather. “All men need something greater than themselves to look up to and worship,” Walsingham tells Elizabeth as the film draws to a close. “They must be able to touch the divine here on earth.” Sometimes, fiction is just more divine.

image